Ron Paul Americans
Wednesday, May 2, 2012
Give Us Our Circus & Our Daily Bread
Saturday, March 3, 2012
Is Washington State not a real state
You can watch the pundits on Main Stream Media and act as if they of less value are illegitimate in some way. They did the same type of picture painting on the election process in Maine as well.Why would any states have any more value then other states in an election except in actual delegate count.
Just the fact that the Maine election results have been withheld for the bad kids getting caught with their hands in the cookie jar. Nobody respects the dog ate my homework excuse from kids or the Spam filter deleted the votes from an adult.There only clear thing the election process has shown me is how corrupt the process has become.
We have 1 billionaire paying 10 Million plus to Newt Gingrich's propped up illusion of a campaign.We have the same corrupt bankers & financial institutions giving basically kick backs to Romney & Obama from their left over treasure chest of tax payer TARP & Bailout money.We have 3 candidates sponsored by wealthy people or corporations.Is this the Roman Empire of Cicero's time it looks just like it in many ways.
Democratic Campaigns are basically being sponsored by HollyWood Actors & DreamWorks. That is why they have great video production in the effort to create their progressive utopian country that really looks more like a bad reality tv show.
Thursday, March 1, 2012
Ron Paul gets up in Bernanke's Grill
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
A line has been drawn in the Sand, on what side of it do you stand.
We as Americans are being put on a very slippery slope towards War.The Money-Lenders, War Mongers and there politician front men. They are busy repeating fictitious statements about Iran on the Elite's Brain Washing Network "Main Stream Media". I would ask all people to please not take what they say at face value there intelligence is nonsense.
I ask you what are you going to do when they want what you own, Then would you want someone to come to your assistance. Why then do you stand by while they steal and kill others lives & property while you watch TV or go to church. These people are just a band of lawless, psychotic robbers & killers.They put a vile stain on the whole human race that will not wash off easily.
Love Your Neighbor, Be Peaceful.
Friday, February 24, 2012
Leftist Junkyard Dog Tactics: Lawrence O’Donnell’s Disgusting Alinsky-Style “Gotcha!” Smear Job of Herman Cain,
Read the Whole Story Here:
You know an MSNBC interview conducted with Herman Cain, a Republican black conservative, by Lawrence O’Donnell, a white, self-proclaimed socialist, has crashed into the quagmire of doom when even fellow leftwing media folks have issues with it for its viciousness, its pettiness, and its racially tinged questions and implications.
O’Donnell made every effort possible to not interview Cain on any of the hot-button topics in America today, but to excoriate him for not serving in Viet Nam. Also, Cain worked for the Navy, but didn’t SERVE in the Navy — O’Donnell became an obnoxious, snarling junkyard dog about both issues, making them seem to be of such importance that he tried to paint Cain as scum who was unfit to run for president.
Uh, Mr. O’Donnell? Bill Clinton and Barack Obama didn’t ever serve in the military. Nor did Hillary Clinton. Nor did former Democrat presidential/adulterous candidate (now disgraced and indicted by a grand jury on six felony charges) John Edwards. Nor did Senate Majority leader Harry Reid, and he’s old enough to have served in several wars, but, uh, DIDN’T. Nor did Department of Justice head Eric Holder, who is on the hot seat for various suspicious doings with the ATF Fast and Furious scandal and the New Black Panthers Party scandal.
Nor did YOU serve in the military, Mr. O’Donnell, nor did you. Although in addition to your writing and work in politics, you also worked as an actor as a recurring character in the cable series Big Love. For a well-off white man like O’Donnell growing up in Boston as the son of an attorney, attacking Cain on his long-ago service record and ignoring his personal triumphs and accomplishments, against many more odds than O’Donnell has ever had to face, is so typical of liberals.
What a slimy hypocrite. A loathsome, disgusting attempt to smear, rather than conduct a legitimate, thought-provoking, informative interview with Cain, who tirelessly worked his way up the ladder of success from virtually nothing — his parents were hard-working but not wealthy, and they instilled in Cain a sense of pride, ethics, and not taking handouts.
O’Donnell also wanted to know why Cain “didn’t do more” during the Civil Rights Movement. Cain would have been barely in his teens during the Civil Rights Movement, which pretty much started with Rosa Parks (called “The First Lady of Civil Rights”) refusing to give up her Montgomery bus seat in 1955 (Cain was only 10 then). Larry, your racism and ignorance are showing, dude.
Saul Alinksy would be sooo proud, as I’m sure George Soros and all the drooling trolls at Media Matters are, too.
Lawrence O'Donnell - Just confused or a blatant Liar
Let us see what Wikipedia states:
Lawrence Francis O'Donnell, Jr. (born November 7, 1951) is a progressive political analyst, journalist, actor, producer, writer, and host of The Last Word with Lawrence O'Donnell, a weeknight MSNBC opinion and news program. O'Donnell called himself a "practical European socialist" in a Newsmaker Interview dated November 11, 2005.
On November 6, 2010, O'Donnell re-declared himself a socialist on the Morning Joe show. The MSNBC host stated, "[U]nlike you, I am not a progressive. I am not a liberal who is so afraid of the word that I had to change my name to progressive. Liberals amuse me. I am a socialist. I live to the extreme left, the extreme left of you mere liberals." [27] On the 1 August 2011 episode of The Last Word, O'Donnell further explained, "I have been calling myself a socialist ever since I first read the definition of socialism in the first economics class I took in college." O'Donnell went on to state that what he means by calling himself a socialist is
"Not that we choose the socialist option every time but we do consider socialism a reasonable option under certain circumstances; in fact, under many circumstances. As any introductory economics course can tell you, there is no capitalist economy anywhere in the world, and there is no socialist economy anywhere in the world, not even Cuba. We are all mixed economies; that is, mixes of capitalism and socialism, and we all vary that mix in different ways. China has more capitalism, and a lot more capitalism, than has Cuba, but it also has a lot more socialism than we [the United States] do. Our socialist programs include the biggest government spending programs: Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, as well as welfare, and the socialist program I hate the most, agriculture subsidies. Yes, I'm a socialist, but I hate bad socialism, and there is plenty of bad socialism out there, just like there is plenty of bad capitalism out there, like the capitalism that pollutes our rivers or makes health care too expensive for so many people. I can argue this because every side of this is true: capitalism is good, capitalism is bad; socialism is good, socialism is bad; all of those things are true at the same time. That's why we have a mixed economy, an economy in which we are trying to use the best, most efficient forms of capitalism, and the best, most efficient forms of socialism, where necessary. So my full truth is I am as much a capitalist as I am a socialist; but since we live in the only mature country in the world where "socialist" is considered such a dirty word that no one would dare admit to being one, I feel more compelled to stand up for the socialist side of me than the capitalist side of me."
He appears just to be another student of Karl Marx & Engels, Trotsky etc. those old crafty utopian architects who build mansions for themselves and ghettos for the rest of the population.
No Thanks, I will pass on Utopiapolis
Thursday, February 23, 2012
Delegate Count - Misleaders
I noticed today a few news organizations giving fictional delegate counts out as factual information. I find it misleading at best and possible deceptive.
2012 Republican Delegates (1,144 Needed To Win)
State Delegates Romney Santorum Gingrich Paul
*Totals -2,286 99 47 32 20
Iowa 28 6 7 0 0
New Hampshire 12* 7 0 0 3
South Carolina 25* 2 0 23 0
Florida 50* 50 0 0 0
Nevada 28 14 3 6 5
Minnesota 40 2 17 1 4
Colorado 36 9 17 2 1
Maine 24 9 3 0 7
* States have been penalized half their delegates
Source :Real Clear Politics
Errors with their data:
Iowa 6+7= 13 and not 28 where are the missing 15? possible Voter Fraud As Well
New Hampshire is missing 2 because 7+3 = 10 not 12 the actual delegate count.
Florida & South Carolina look correct due to Winner Take All and there total are correct.
Nevada is Open to Speculation due to possible fraud with many Main Stream Media sources.
Minnesota 2+17+1+4= 24 and not 40 where are the 12 missing delegates.
Colorado 9+17+2+1= 29 and not 36 where are the missing 7 ?
Maine 9+7+3= 19 and not 24 wheres the missing 5 ? Plus fraud.MSNBC Sources, Thanks Rachel Maddow